#CURREN$Y THE GAME SPOTIFY FREE#

A good antidote to complacency about Omicron. What I’ve been readingĬovid-19: Endemic Doesn’t Mean Harmless is the title of a sobering article in Nature by Aris Katzourakis. So while Spotify may have succeeded in taming – or suborning – the mighty music industry, when it comes to handling political extremism and conspiracy theorists it’s clearly out of its depth. From what we have learned so far about combating mis- and disinformation, labelling is as likely to boost bad stuff as it is to correct errors. Which makes him, I would say, a publisher and therefore someone not entitled to the legal protections enjoyed by Facebook, Twitter et al in the US.Īnd on top of that, there is Ek’s naivety in thinking that labelling content about contentious matters is a way of doing good. Ek, on the other hand, has paid Joe Rogan $100m to broadcast from Spotify’s platform. Whatever you might say about the latter, one thing it does not do is pay its users for what they post on its platform. The first is what philosophers would call a category mistake – “assigning to something a quality or action which can only properly be assigned to things of another category”. There are, however, a couple of problems with this fatuous virtue-signalling. And, just like Facebook, Spotify would henceforth be labelling content with warnings and directing users to a Covid-19 information hub with inputs from scientists and health experts.

#CURREN$Y THE GAME SPOTIFY FREE#

And, of course, he wanted to support free speech – “while balancing it with the safety of our users”. He vowed to provide “greater transparency” on the company’s content rules. And in his attempt to “manage” the controversy, Spotify’s co-founder Ek consulted the Facebook playbook. I mean to say, a hundred million bucks is a lot of money, even in the debased currency of the tech industry. Whatever you might say about Facebook, one thing it does not do is pay its users for what they post on its platformįaced with these ultimatums, why did Spotify do? You only have to ask the question to know the answer. “I am doing this,” he wrote, “because Spotify is spreading fake information about vaccines, potentially causing death to those who believe the disinformation being spread by them.” Shortly afterwards, Joni Mitchell announced that she was taking the same line.

The musical superstar Neil Young gave the company an ultimatum: it could have his music or Joe Rogan’s podcast but not both. The complainants especially objected to an episode that had featured Robert W Malone, a medical researcher whom Twitter had permanently suspended from its platform, citing “repeated violations of our Covid-19 misinformation policy”, together with a comment Rogan made where he stated that he believed that young, healthy people do not need a Covid-19 vaccine.Īt this point, Spotify experienced a sudden collision between its interests in music and podcasting. In January this year, an episode of the Rogan show prompted an open letter signed by 270 health care professionals calling on Spotify to develop a counter-misinformation policy on the platform. And in May 2020 the company persuaded the popular American comedian Joe Rogan to move his podcast, The Joe Rogan Experience, exclusively to Spotify in return for a reported $100m. In 2009, for example, it was reported that Lady Gaga’s hit song Poker Face had been streamed 1m times on Spotify, for which she received the princely royalty of $167! In May 2015, Spotify, seeing that Apple and Amazon were getting into the music streaming business, decided that it was also going to diversify into podcasts.

Given its dominance in the distribution of music, Spotify has inevitably been at the centre of controversies about the royalties musicians get paid for having their work streamed on the platform.

Curren$y the game spotify